Named Parameters
The mechanism of named parameters is one of the central features of the Fram programming language. With the support of other language constructs, named parameters are used to express a variety of advanced programming features, such as parametric polymorphism, existential types, record types, and ML-like module system. Here we give a brief overview of named parameters in Fram.
Parametric Polymorphism and Type Schemes
Fram supports ML-style parametric polymorphism and type reconstruction. Briefly, the type of a function is automatically inferred by the compiler and generalized to be as polymorphic as possible. For instance, consider the following definition of the identity function.
let id x = x
The compiler infers the type of id to be T -> T for each type T.
To represent such polymorphism over type T, the type system assigns
type schemes to variables. The type scheme of the id function is
{type T} -> T -> T, where the first arrow {type T} -> ... binds
the type parameter T in the rest of the type T -> T. When a variable
with a type scheme is used, all parameters within curly braces of the
type scheme are instantiated. In the case of type parameters, the compiler
guesses the actual types to be used for instantiation based on the
context of the usage. For example, the id function can be used with
different types as follows.
let a = id 42 # instantiates T to Int
let b = id "abc" # instantiates T to String
The programmer can also explicitly specify type parameters when defining
the function. For example, the equivalent definition of id with an explicit
type parameter is as follows.
let id {type T} (x : T) = x
It is also possible to define functions with multiple type parameters.
let const {type A, type B} (x : A) (_ : B) = x
The type scheme of const is {type A, type B} -> A -> B -> A.
Named Type Parameters
Type parameters presented in the previous section are anonymous, i.e., their
names are not visible outside the definition. Indeed, the programmer has no
means to specify the names of type parameters that were implicitly introduced
by ML-style type inference. However, Fram also supports named type
parameters, which can be explicitly specified by the programmer. To specify a
named type parameter, the type keyword is omitted and only the name of the
parameter is written within curly braces. For example, the definition of the
id function with a named type parameter is as follows.
# identity function with a type scheme {T} -> T -> T
let id {T} (x : T) = x
When a polymorphic function has a named type parameter, it can be explicitly instantiated by specifying the name of the type parameter and the actual type to be used for instantiation. When the explicit instantiation is omitted, the compiler infers the actual type as usual.
let intId = id {T=Int}
let strId = id : String -> String # infers T to be String
When multiple named type parameters are present, the programmer can specify the actual types for some of the parameters, and let the compiler infer the rest. Moreover, the order of the specified parameters can be arbitrary.
let pair {A, B} (x : A) (y : B) = (x, y)
let p1 = pair {A=Int, B=String} 42 "abc"
let p2 = pair {B=String} 42 "abc" # infers A to be Int
let p3 = pair {B=String, A=Int} 42 "abc"
In rare cases, the programmer may want to give a name to a type parameter
that is the same as an existing type in the current scope, and still be able
to refer to both the existing type and the type parameter within the function
body. In order to avoid name clashes, the name visible in the scheme can be
different from the name of the type parameter used within the function body.
For example, assume that the type T is already defined in the current scope.
Then, the following definition abstracts over a type parameter named T, but
for the purpose of the definition, the type parameter is referred to as U,
while T still refers to the existing type.
type T = Int # existing type T
let foo {T=U} (x : T -> U) = x 42
# Almost equivalent definition, but with a different name of the type parameter
let bar {U} (x : T -> U) = x 42
let _ = foo {T=Int} id
let _ = bar {T=Int} id # Warning: bar doesn't expect T parameter
The same can be done in type schemes. The type scheme of foo is
{T=U} -> (T -> U) -> U. Note that the type variable U is bound, so it can
be renamed to e.g., V ({T=V} -> (T -> V) -> V) without changing the
meaning of the type scheme. In fact, the syntax {T} -> ... is just
syntactic sugar for {T=T} -> ....
Regular Named Parameters
In Fram, named parameters are not limited to type parameters. Regular named parameters can also be defined and used in a similar manner. The names of regular parameters start with a lowercase letter.
let linear {a : Int, b : Int} x = a * x + b
let intId = linear {a=1, b=0}
let const b = linear {b, a=0} # shorthand for linear {b=b, a=0}
As before, the order of specified named parameters can be arbitrary, however, when instantiating with effectful parameters, the order of evaluation is always from left to right. In contrast to type parameters, all regular named parameters must be explicitly specified when using the function.
Optional Parameters
Fram also supports optional named parameters. Optional parameters have names
starting with a question mark, but bind a variable with the same name without
this character. This variable has type Option T, where T is the type of
the parameter.
# The scheme of greet is {?name : String} -> Unit ->> String
let greet {?name} () =
match name with
| Some n => "Hello, " + n + "!"
| None => "Hello, world!"
end
Optional parameters can be omitted when the function is used. In this case,
the value None is passed to the function. When the parameter is specified,
the value is wrapped in the Some constructor. Moreover, the programmer can
pass a value of type Option _ directly, when the name used in the
instantiation starts with a question mark.
let msg1 = greet () # name is None
let msg2 = greet {name="Alice"} () # name is Some "Alice"
let msg3 = greet {?name=None} () # name is None
let msg4 = greet {?name=Some "Bob"} () # name is Some "Bob"
Implicit Parameters
Another useful feature of named parameters in Fram is implicit parameters.
Implicit parameters come together with a special namespace for variables,
which have names starting with a tilde (~). Names of implicit parameters also
start with a tilde, and if not stated otherwise, they bind variables with the
same names. Implicit parameters can be omitted when the function is used. In
such a case, the compiler resolves the value of the parameter by searching for
a variable with the same name in the current scope.
let doSomething {~log : String ->> Unit} () =
~log "Doing something important!";
let result = 42 in
~log "Something important is done.";
result
To call a function which has implicit parameters, the programmer can either specify the value of the parameter explicitly, or define a variable with the same name in the current scope.
let _ = doSomething {~log=printStrLn} ()
let doWithoutLogging () =
let ~log msg = () in # define a no-op logger
doSomething () # compiler uses the local ~log
When a function takes an implicit parameter, it introduces it into the implicit namespace for the body of the function. Therefore, implicit parameters can be transitively passed to other functions which also take implicit parameters.
let doMore {~log} () =
~log "Starting doing more";
let result = doSomething () in
~log "Finished doing more";
result
Same as with other named parameters, the programmer may bind an implicit
parameter to a different name to avoid name clashes. A binder {~name} is
just syntactic sugar for {~name=~name}.
let doSomethingElse {~log=logger} () =
logger "Doing something else"
Sections
When programming with named parameters, especially implicit parameters, often
the same named parameters are passed repeatedly to multiple functions. To
avoid such boilerplate code, Fram supports sections, which allow grouping
definitions with common named parameters. A named parameter can be declared
at any point within a section using the parameter keyword, and will be added
to the type schemes of all following definitions that use this parameter.
In particular, a declared implicit parameter behaves similarly to dynamically
bound variables in Lisp-like languages, but in a type-safe manner.
parameter ~log : String ->> Unit
let doSomething () =
~log "Doing something important!";
let result = 42 in
~log "Something important is done.";
result
let doMore () =
~log "Starting doing more";
let result = doSomething () in
~log "Finished doing more";
result
let doMoreTwice () =
doMore ();
doMore ()
let doAllIgnoringLogging () =
let ~log msg = () in
doSomething ();
doMoreTwice ()
In the above example, functions doSomething, doMore, and doMoreTwice use
the implicit parameter ~log directly or indirectly, so their type schemes
include a ~log parameter. On the other hand, doAllIgnoringLogging doesn't
have a ~log parameter, because it doesn't use it in its body: it defines a
local ~log that shadows the implicit parameter. The parameter construct can
also be used to declare other kinds of named parameters. For instance, this
mechanism can be used to name type parameters, but keep the code concise.
parameter Elem
parameter Acc
let rec foldLeft (f : Acc -> Elem ->> Acc) acc xs =
match xs with
| [] => acc
| y :: ys => foldLeft f (f acc y) ys
end
The scope of a parameter declaration extends to the end of the current
section. In most cases it is the end of the current file or module. For local
definitions within a function body, the scope of a parameter declaration extends
to the in keyword that ends the block of local definitions.
let foo {~log} () =
parameter ~log : String ->> Unit
# the following two definitions have a ~log parameter
let bar () = ~log "In bar"
let baz () = ~log "In baz"; bar ()
in
# the following definition does not have a ~log parameter;
# the ~log here refers to the parameter of foo
let quux () = ~log "In quux" in
bar ()
Rank-N Types and Higher-Order Functions
At the level of types, named parameters are part of a type scheme rather than a type. Therefore, named parameters are always instantiated at the time of usage. This is particularly important for optional parameters, since the presence or absence of an optional parameter is always clear from the call site, which avoids possible ambiguities. On the other hand, this design choice implies that functions with named parameters are not truly first-class values: they cannot be returned directly from functions. However, Fram allows a form of Rank-N types for all kinds of named parameters, so it allows functions with named parameters to be passed as arguments to other functions. For example, the following function takes a function with named parameters as an argument and applies it.
let foo (f : {X, x : X} -> (X -> _) -> _) =
f {x=42} id
The limitation of this mechanism is that arguments with non-trivial type
schemes must be explicitly annotated, as argument f in the above example.
This requirement is standard in languages with Rank-N types.
To pass a function with named parameters as an argument, the programmer can
use a lambda expression with named parameters. For example, to call the above
foo function with a lambda expression, the following code can be used.
foo (fn {x} g => g x)
The programmer can omit some named parameters in the lambda expression. In
such a case, the omitted parameters will be introduced without giving them
names. For the kinds of named parameters introduced in this section, it means
that the omitted parameters cannot be explicitly referred to within the body
of the lambda expression. However, these parameters may still be accessible
indirectly through the type inference (e.g., variable x in the above example
has type X, which is an omitted named type parameter) or the method
resolution mechanism (described in later sections).
When the lambda abstraction doesn't bind named parameters at all, implicit parameters behave differently. In order to mimic the behavior of dynamically bound variables, implicit parameters are automatically introduced to the context of the lambda body. For example, consider the following code.
let logToStdout (f : {~log} -> _) =
f {~log=printStrLn}
let _ = logToStdout (fn () =>
~log "Logging to stdout")
In this example, the ~log parameter is automatically introduced to the body
of the lambda expression, so the programmer can use it directly. This behavior
is specific to implicit parameters; other kinds of named parameters must be
explicitly bound in the lambda abstraction to be used within the body.